A retrospective in user-centered chaos
Experienced designer. Strategic thinker. Creative executor.
This presentation contains work that has never shipped.
There is a reason for that. We will get into it.

The brief was: bold brand identity for a tote company. The AI delivered a headless person in a purple suit with tattoo gloves holding a burger tote. The brand name is orange. It says BORNT TOAT. This was not caught. It was saved anyway.
"Typographic choices were bold. Perhaps too bold. The brand name has been reconsidered."

A second attempt at the Bornt Toat campaign. Still headless. Different gloves. Neon glow added. The name still says BORNT TOAT. The iteration did not address the core issue. The burger is still there. The blue outfit was not requested.
"Second attempt. The neon glow was added. The typo was not fixed. This is called shipping."

Exploration of organic textures and natural materials. The model interpreted "organic" literally. A full cooked breakfast is adhered to the tote. The egg is sunny side up. The gloves are mesh. The tote appears structurally sound.
"User testing revealed confusion around the food. The gloves scored well."

A continuation of the breakfast tote series. This iteration features toast. The egg has migrated to the toast. The bacon surrounds everything. The lace gloves have returned with ruffles. The blue tile wall was not in the brief.
"The breakfast motif has appeared in three consecutive projects. This is a design language."

Brand identity mockup for Burnt Totes. Two letters are missing. Two are merged. One is leaving. The setting is a bathroom. The bathroom was not specified. The model chose the bathroom. The leather gloves were also not requested.
"Kerning not reviewed prior to export. The brand has been renamed internally."

Signage concept for a restaurant branding project. The restaurant was called Bacon Czech. The AI rendered it as BABON CECCH in 3D slab serif on teal tile. The letter doubling is unexplained. The letters are confident. They are wrong but confident.
"The client did not receive this. The letters have been addressed in v2. v2 does not exist yet."

A luxury editorial concept for a men's brand. A man in a cream suit holds a gold brocade handbag with a tassel. He is wearing white lace gloves. This is a tote bag brand. The brocade bag was not a tote. The lace gloves have appeared again.
"The gloves have now appeared in every project. This is being investigated."

A brand campaign for an undetermined project. A redheaded woman in denim reaches toward a crescent moon while sitting on a satellite dish. The starfield is dramatic. There is no tote bag. There is no brief that explains this.
"The vision was there. The brief was not. The moon was not requested. The moon is good."

Conceptual campaign exploring identity and self-perception. A woman holds a framed painting of herself on a red couch. The painting shows her. She is also there. Neither is holding a tote bag. This was a tote bag brief.
"The brief asked for a bag. The model asked a bigger question. We kept it."

A woman in a beret holds an enormous abstract expressionist canvas covering most of her body. The beret is correct. There is a small piece of plastic wrap on her head for unknown reasons. No tote bag is present.
"The canvas is technically a bag. We are choosing to see this as a pivot."

An editorial lifestyle shoot for Burnt Totes. The model has six limbs. She is wearing safety goggles in both frames. In the second shot she emerges from the tote as if hatched from it. This was described as a lifestyle shoot.
"Casting cannot be replicated. The model cannot be found. The goggles remain unexplained."

Youth lifestyle campaign concept. A girl sits on a school hallway floor looking at a photo frame. There is a hat on the floor. There are chips. She is not holding a tote bag. The hallway was AI's choice. The chips were not briefed.
"The target demographic is not in school. The chips suggest otherwise. Filed under research."

A candid lifestyle campaign: a woman at a tropical restaurant at night holding a tote bag with lace gloves. The gloves have appeared again. The timestamp reads 02/28/25. This is the most photorealistic image in the collection. The gloves are still unexplained.
"Closest to a real campaign image. Still never used. The gloves are a pattern now."

Created at 2am. Solar eclipse, vintage microphone, red eyeshadow, needle wire scribbles, and what may be a signature or a hex. No brief existed. No tote bag appears. The designer does not remember writing this prompt. She believes it is her best work.
"No brief. No tote. No explanation. This one stays forever."
The gloves were never requested.
The bathroom was never specified.
The breakfast was not in the brief.
I am still a designer.
✦ BROOKLYN, NY · CURRENTLY IDEATING · RESPONSE TIME: 4-7 MIN ✦